On 2005-01-27 20:53:00, Allan Engelhardt wrote in CYBAEA Journal:
Tim Oren is one of the consistently insightful venture capital bloggers, and his latest post, New Model Software Startups: Two Stage Ventures articulates a very strong trend that I have seen for some time but has not been exactly able to express. Interesting that it should be the same story at the same time on both sides of the Atlantic.
Tim identifies a new pattern in startups which he calls the two stage venture
. He focuses on software, but I don't think that is important. In the first stage, the venture builds a useful product as cheaply as possible
focusing ruthlessly on the value differentiators.
Build as little as possible, as fast and cheaply as possible, while demonstrating some unique value.
The second stage is either a trade sale or a venture capital expansion phase. For the second option, Tim predicts that the entrepreneurs will receive valuations well above what they would have commanded before achieving a first stage takeoff
because some of the risk has been taken away. For the first, he suggests that the market has genuinely changed:
While the [trade] sale may result in only a few million dollars, that outcome may be quite profitable to the founders and the individual backers. This may even be true on a risk adjusted basis, and that may be a new thing.
This is exactly the pattern I have seen here in Europe, especially over the last year or so. Consistently, the companies I have seen that have been successful have followed this path and consistently the ones that have failed to achieve success have not followed this approach.
Are other people seeing the same thing? Why this change now?
On 2009-07-02 20:33:00, Allan Engelhardt wrote in CYBAEA Data and Analysis:
I am a sucker for good quality data. I wrote about data.gov, the US Government data site before, and now I find OECD Statistics which has some 300 data sets, many of which seems to be readily accessible (though some may require subscription)
Read more (~53 words).
On 2009-06-16 10:27:00, Allan Engelhardt wrote in CYBAEA Data and Analysis:
I like the "multicore" library for a particular task. I can easily write a combination of if(require("multicore",...)) that means that my function will automatically use the parallel mclapply() instead of lapply() where it is available. Which is grand 99% of the time, except when my function is called from mclapply() (or one of the lower level functions) in which case much CPU trashing and grinding of teeth will result.
So, I needed a function to determine if my function was called from any function in the "multicore" library. Here it is.
Read more (~190 words).
On 2009-06-12 10:23:00, Allan Engelhardt wrote in CYBAEA Data and Analysis:
Somebody on the R-help mailing list asked how to get Rmpi working on his Fedora Linux machine so he could do high-performance computing on a cluster of machines (or a single multicore machine) using the R statistical computing and analysis platform. Since it is unusually painful to get working, I might as well copy the instructions here.
Read more (~414 words, 2 comments).
On 2009-06-09 11:23:00, Allan Engelhardt wrote in CYBAEA Data and Analysis:
O’Reilly has published Data Mashups in R as a $4.99 PDF download in their Short Cut series. In 27 pages it takes you through an example of how to combine foreclosure information with maps and geographical information to produce plots like the one here. This is all done with the R statistical computing and analysis platform.
Read more (~108 words).
On 2009-06-01 07:07:00, Allan Engelhardt wrote in CYBAEA Data and Analysis:
Hugh Miller, the team leader of the winner of the KDD Cup 2009 Slow Challenge (which we wrote about recently) kindly provides more information about how to win this public challenge using the R statistical computing and analysis platform on a laptop (!).
Read more (~456 words).
Join the discussion
There are no comments yet. Be the first to comment.