The Knapsack Problem

2009-07-10 20:30:00 Allan Engelhardt wrote in CYBAEA Data and Analysis:

David posts a question about how to solve this knapsack problem using the R statistical computing and analysis platform. My reply in the comments seems to have disappeared for a while so here is my proposed solution. See David’s blog for my earlier proposed solution with a very common error.

## http://blog.revolution-computing.com/2009/07/because-its-friday-the-knapsack-problem.html
appetizer.solution <- local (
function (target) {
  app <- c(2.15, 2.75, 3.35, 3.55, 4.20, 5.80)
  r <- 2L
  repeat {
	c <- gtools::combinations(length(app), r=r, v=app, repeats.allowed=TRUE)
	s <- rowSums(c)
	if ( all(s > target) ) {
	  print("No solution found")
	  break
	}
	x <- which( abs(s-target) < 1e-4 )
	if ( length(x) > 0L ) {
	  cat("Solution found: ", c[x,], "\n")
	  break
	}
	r <- r + 1L
  }
})

appetizer.solution(15.05)
# Solution found:  2.15 3.55 3.55 5.8 

Brute force works, it just doesn’t scale well. (Note that 7×2.15 is another solution.)

Subscribe to CYBAEA Data and Analysis

Jump to comments.

You may also like these posts:

  1. [0.38] Employee productivity as function of number of workers revisited

    We have a mild obsession with employee productivity and how that declines as companies get bigger. We have previously found that when you treble the number of workers, you halve their individual productivity which is mildly scary. We revisit the analysis …

Join the discussion

Do you agree or disagree? Have a question of want to make a point? Join the discussion:

There are no comments yet. Be the first to comment.